2004 Legislative Voter Guide

House District 47 – Carbon & Albany counties

Dist.	Candidate		1a	1b	1c	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11
HD47	Kurt Bucholz*	R	+	-	-	-	-	-	+	~	+	-	-	-	+

(+) Supports the Conservation Voters position
(-)Opposes the Conservation Voters position
(~) Depends (?) Don’t Know (N) Not answered (*) Denotes Incumbent

1. In recent legislative sessions, various bills have been considered to increase public access and recreational use of public lands. In general, would you support each of the following types of legislation:
(a) Allowing overnight camping on state land, where not in conflict with the lessee’s operations?

Kurt Bucholz (R): Yes. Measures should accompany this policy to insure littering, fire hazard and resource protection concerns are adequately addressed.

(b) Requiring those who lease state land for grazing (not for crop production) to provide walk-in access for hunting, fishing and other recreational activities, where not in conflict with the lessee’s operations?

Kurt Bucholz (R): No.

(c) Allowing boaters to disembark and recreate streamside up to the high-water mark on all navigable water of the state?

Kurt Bucholz (R): No.

2. Do you support the U.S. Forest Service’s initiative to protect remaining unroaded areas in national forests from new road construction and commercial logging?

Kurt Bucholz (R): No. I applaud measures to limit construction of new, permanent roads, but strongly oppose policies which prevent the harvest of valuable, renewable fiber resources.

3. In the 2002 and 2004 Legislative sessions, bills were considered to establish a permanent wildlife trust fund, which would set aside a fixed sum to generate interest which would pay to conserve and improve wildlife habitat; address human-wildlife conflicts; support non-consumptive use of wildlife; and generate income for endangered species management, which is currently paid for with hunter and angler license fees. In general, would you support a similar bill?

Kurt Bucholz (R): No. I think it would be highly irresponsible to create a system by which public financial resources are provided to a government agency with no attendant accountability by elected officials or representatives of the people.

4. Wyoming lawmakers have so far decided not to set aside a permanent trust fund for wildlife-related costs, such as the one described in the previous question. This has led Gov. Dave Freudenthal to instead propose devoting a fraction of existing state general fund revenue )not a new tax) to pay for some of the costs of preserving habitat affected by natural resource development. In general, would you support this approach?

Kurt Bucholz (R): No. I disagree with your premise. This would be a new tax in that a new purpose for state revenues is identified thus removing the use of these resources from some previous need or purpose. Further, a preferred means to provide for habitat protection is to appropriate state funds for worthy projects as they are identified.

5. With the current boom in coalbed methane and other types of natural gas development, conflicts are emerging between surface landowners, and the owners and developers of subsurface minerals. Current state law does not require developers to negotiate a surface-use agreement in such cases. In general, would you support requiring extractive mineral producers to negotiate such an agreement, or else provide appropriate financial guarantees to clean up potential damage?

Kurt Bucholz (R): Yes. I would support measures to insure cleanup of potential damage. I may or may not support the requirement for surface use agreements depending on the specifics of the proposed requirement.

6. Would you support legislation that would reduce Wyoming’s environmental standards for air, land or water quality?

Kurt Bucholz (R): Depends on which standard.

7. Unregulated use of outdoor lighting causes increased light pollution and light trespass, and is considered by some to be a nuisance that diminishes their quality of life. Poorly designed lighting can also cause glare that distracts drivers and wastes energy by illuminating the night sky rather than the ground-level landscape. Municipalities’ right to adopt ordinances regulating the use of outdoor lighting is unclear under state law, while counties have no such authority at all. In general, would you support legislation to clearly authorize municipalities and counties to adopt ordinances that regulate the use of outdoor lighting?

Kurt Bucholz (R): Yes.

8. In 1986, the Wyoming Legislature passed the In-Stream Flow Law, which allowed the state to hold a water right to use for natural water flow in a stream channel for the benefit of fisheries, while simultaneously maintaining other users’ pre-existing water rights. Unfortunately, the law created an unnecessarily lengthy, contentious and time-consuming process for protecting such water flows, to the point that the law is little-used and provides very minimal legal protections that apply in only a few real-world situations. In general, would you support legislation to streamline this process, so that actual in-stream flows could be preserved or enhanced for uses such as recreation, water-quality enhancement or municipal purposes?

Kurt Bucholz (R): No. Proposals previously offered to “streamline” this process go much further than just streamlining. I would, and have, supported measures that would provide for enhancements of in-stream flows while protecting long-established water rights that address other beneficial uses of our state’s water.

9. Wyoming’s wolf management plan and the underlying legislation classifies wolves as predators to be shot on sight in most of the state without regulations. In January 2004, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service declared the plan inadequate to ensure sustainable wolf populations, and specifically unlikely to withstand the legal challenges expected both from staunch anti-wolf activists and from out-of-state environmental groups. Meanwhile, without federal approval for a Wyoming plan, the wolf will remain under strict federal protections. These federal regulations hamper the ability of ranchers or game wardens to manage this controversial species, either to protect property and people, or to prevent more territory being inhabited by wolves. Legislators this year considered a measure to modestly increase wolf protection while still limiting where new packs can establish themselves. However, the bill failed and the state instead sued the federal government to try to salvage its “predator status” plan. In general, do you feel the state is justified in pursuing this lawsuit rather than correcting deficiencies in the wolf management plan?

Kurt Bucholz (R): Yes. I don’t agree there are any deficiencies in the state’s wolf management plan, other than it erroneously included the Gros Ventre as a trophy management area.

10. Gov. Freudenthal has overturned a policy of his predecessor called the “One Voice Policy.” Under this past policy, the governor’s office commented on behalf of the entire state government on various planning processes, which often involved large new development plans for energy extraction which include significant impacts on our wildlife and natural resources. When final comments would go out, state wildlife managers and environmental authorities often saw their concerns marginalized by pro-development voices from elsewhere in state government. In general, do you agree with Gov. Freudenthal’s decision to let different state agencies comment freely on their own areas of expertise without political involvement from the governor’s office?

Kurt Bucholz (R): No. I don’t object at all to agencies commenting freely in their areas of expertise; however, when these comments spill over into the area of political speech, tending to advocate or deride in areas of controversial public policy, I think our chief executive should be involved.

11. Current state bonding for oil and gas wells requires $25,000 per well and $150,000 for a collection of wells. This leaves many multiple-well fields without adequate reclamation funds if the operator is unable to pay for cleanup work. In such cases, the state must use oil and gas tax revenue to pay for this work. In general, would you support increasing the bond totals for oil, gas and coalbed methane reclamation?

Kurt Bucholz (R): Yes.

*****

Wyoming Conservation Voters is an independent nonpartisan, nonprofit organization under chapter 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. Founded in 2001 by prominent hunters, anglers and conservationists, WCV serves to educate concerned voters about candidates’ positions on issues affecting our wildlife and other natural resources.

For more information, visit our Web site at www.wyovoters.org, call (307) 265–0870, fax us at (307) 265–0893, or stop by at 1915 Oxford Lane, Suite 201, in Casper.