
2004 Legislative
Voter Guide
House District 54 – Lander/Fremont
County
|
Dist. |
Candidate |
|
1a |
1b |
1c |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HD54 |
Del McOmie* |
R |
+ |
+ |
- |
- |
~ |
- |
+ |
~ |
+ |
+ |
- |
~ |
- |
(+) Supports
the Conservation Voters position
(-)Opposes the Conservation Voters position
(~)
Depends (?) Don’t Know (N)
Not answered (*) Denotes Incumbent
1.
In recent legislative
sessions, various bills have been considered to increase public access and
recreational use of public lands. In general, would you support each of the following types of legislation:
(a) Allowing overnight camping on state land, where not in conflict with the
lessee’s operations?
Del McOmie (R):
Yes. [Circled “where not in conflict with the lessee’s operations.”]
(b) Requiring those who lease state land for
grazing (not for crop production) to provide walk-in access for hunting,
fishing and other recreational activities, where not in conflict with the
lessee’s operations?
Del McOmie
(R): Yes.
(c) Allowing boaters to disembark and
recreate streamside up to the high-water mark on all navigable water of the
state?
Del McOmie
(R): No.
2.
Do you support the
Del McOmie (R): No.
3.
In the 2002 and 2004
Legislative sessions, bills were considered to establish a permanent wildlife
trust fund, which would set aside a fixed sum to generate interest which would
pay to conserve and improve wildlife habitat; address human-wildlife conflicts;
support non-consumptive use of wildlife; and generate income for endangered
species management, which is currently paid for with hunter and angler license
fees. In general, would you support a similar bill?
Del McOmie (R): Only if there was
legislative oversight of fund and how interest was being spent.
4.
Del McOmie (R): No.
5.
With the current boom in coalbed methane and other types of natural gas development,
conflicts are emerging between surface landowners, and the owners and
developers of subsurface minerals. Current state law does not require developers
to negotiate a surface-use agreement in such cases. In general, would you
support requiring extractive mineral producers to negotiate such an agreement,
or else provide appropriate financial guarantees to clean up potential damage?
Del McOmie (R): Yes. Legislation is being
studied presently for introduction in the 2005 session.
6.
Would
you support legislation that would reduce
Del McOmie (R): Probably not. This is too broad a statement
to say yes or no.
7.
Unregulated use of outdoor
lighting causes increased light pollution and light trespass, and is considered
by some to be a nuisance that diminishes their quality of life. Poorly designed
lighting can also cause glare that distracts drivers and wastes energy by
illuminating the night sky rather than the ground-level landscape.
Municipalities’ right to adopt ordinances regulating the use of outdoor
lighting is unclear under state law, while counties have no such authority at
all. In general, would you support legislation to clearly authorize
municipalities and counties to adopt ordinances that regulate the use of
outdoor lighting?
Del McOmie (R): Yes.
8.
In 1986, the
Del McOmie (R): Yes.
9.
Del McOmie (R): Yes.
10.
Gov. Freudenthal
has overturned a policy of his predecessor called the “One Voice Policy.” Under
this past policy, the governor’s office commented on behalf of the entire state
government on various planning processes, which often involved large new
development plans for energy extraction which include significant impacts on
our wildlife and natural resources. When final comments would go out, state
wildlife managers and environmental authorities often saw their concerns
marginalized by pro-development voices from elsewhere in state government. In
general, do you agree with Gov. Freudenthal’s
decision to let different state agencies comment freely on their own areas of
expertise without political involvement from the governor’s office?
Del McOmie (R): Seems this has not happened;
reference the statements by Game & Fish personnel on the wolf management
plan. I think this is a political move to look good in certain areas.
11.
Current state bonding for
oil and gas wells requires $25,000 per well and $150,000 for a collection of
wells. This leaves many multiple-well fields without adequate reclamation funds
if the operator is unable to pay for cleanup work. In such cases, the state
must use oil and gas tax revenue to pay for this work. In general, would you
support increasing the bond totals for oil, gas and coalbed
methane reclamation?
Del McOmie (R): No. Need more information on
abuse before I would support such legislation.
*****
Wyoming Conservation Voters is an independent nonpartisan, nonprofit
organization under chapter 501(c)(4) of the Internal
Revenue Code. Founded in 2001 by prominent hunters, anglers and
conservationists, WCV serves to educate concerned voters about candidates’
positions on issues affecting our wildlife and other natural resources.
For more information, visit our Web site at www.wyovoters.org, call (307) 265–0870,
fax us at (307) 265–0893, or stop by at